Showing posts with label Charles Tarlton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charles Tarlton. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 4, 2017


An Ekphrastic poem by Charles Tarlton


James McNeill Whistler’s Red and Black: the Fan (1894)  and Kenneth Paul Block’s Drawing for the cover of James Brady’s novel, Fashion Show (2009)



All good colors are equally beautiful;  it is only in the question of their combination that art comes in.
                         -- Oscar Wilde

In the austere harmony of red and black there is at once both contradiction and beauty.  Where red is nearly all, the thinner black slithers up, punctuates the shape of red.  Oh, that long black feathered line down the middle of her red dress!  On the right, the black dress flaunts a splash of bright red flowers or ribbons in the décolletage, and catches our eye, the black dress slinky as the boa on the red.  I would make metaphors of these two, and have each contemplate the other in her gaze.

strike me a Grecian
coin between hard iron dies
a silver drachma -
heads, the goddess Athena
a wise old owl comes up tails

my lady in red
leans forward in the mirror
dreaming of a black
gossamer frock dotted red
dreaming herself into it

see the girl inside
that black dress.  What does she crave?
to hang on a wall
where the museum displays  
its admired Whistler women

Monday, November 21, 2016

Charles Tarlton's "Richard Diebenkorn, Ocean Park 17"


"...[the] classic situation of trying to reveal in language what the act of seeing provokes.”
                                                                                                              — Robert Creeley

The artist stands ready in the presence of a blank canvas, but nothing so far has happened.  Up ahead in time a finished painting is waiting, but something has to take place now to launch the creative act.  The painter has a long straight edge and a piece of charcoal; he draws three parallel horizontal lines, and then, fidgeting with the straight edge, lays in three more parallel lines diagonally.  The canvas has been “besmirched,” and the artist has his problem.

these are not pictures
out the transom, but pictures roused
by the geometry
of it. The lines creating
shapes in a regular pattern

from the toothings
of these inaugural gestures
the painting grows
according to a logic born
of the moment’s vagaries

Here is a definition of process.  Building on the stimulus of the first lines he drew on the canvas, the painter improvises colored shapes as needed, drawing other lines, following the promptings of whatever just emerged, gesture, then color, then another gesture, until he is exhausted.  But, wait, the next morning, back in the studio, he repents, and begins to scratch out and paint over yesterday’s markings, leaving hints to reveal here and there the way he had come.

he only knew it was
finished once he’d come back
from abandoning it
in despair, to find it all
working perfectly

any truth in the art
derives from his accruing
fragmented judgments
over a frantic period
of exasperated struggle

You cannot ask what any of it means or represents, more than his efforts to get right the thing that had kept going.  The peculiar angular drawings in the top half of the picture just happened in the working out of pressures from the day before.  They are pictures of nothing, lines arranged to the emotional satisfaction of the artist.  Still, they are interesting, are they not?

what do you think
stairways, the generally celestial?
closer up, the details
confute interpretation in the sense
of particular visions

what’s wonderful
is exactly that elaborate
drawing of figures
without subject or reference
then knowing they were right

All the Ocean Parks started the same manner, though this is not something one can say in a strictly historically way.  No one was there watching, but the familiar diagonals appear in nearly every painting (are they hiding in every one?) cutting across the horizontal-vertical matrix.  And in nearly every painting they have been worked back into the deep pentimenti by over-painting and erasure, never completely obliterated because they constituted the glimpse from which the works arose.  Not perfect evidence, perhaps, but enough to help us understand the genesis of the archetypal motif.

but still it’s details
differentiate each painting
from the others
keep each one interesting
in its own familial way

no two days alike
exactly, no two Ocean Parks
precisely the same
number of triangles, the same
dispositions of red

Art Criticism 101B

what if he had
a giant dictionary in his head
could he give meanings
to the shapes in their arrangement
so we’d know what they meant?

we might then indeed
find California light made manifest
O, geography of the west
in the myriad exotic objects
he is said to have portrayed

*Ocean Park #17 can be viewed online at: http://uima.uiowa.edu/richard-diebenkorn/

Here is an excerpt from the descriptive curatorial essay on the University of Iowa Museum of Art’s website, a perfect illustration of what is most wrong with Diebenkorn criticism today.

No. 17 is a brilliant example of Richard Diebenkorn's now legendary exploration of architecture and light in his Ocean Park series.  The Ocean Park works are essentially conversations between "ocean" — broad areas of atmospheric color implying nature's vastness — and "park" — ambiguous lines evoking a desire for order and containment.

“Ocean Park” refers neither to the “ocean” nor to a “park,” but to an area near the beach in Santa Monica, California, north and south of Ocean Park Blvd.  This is where Diebenkorn had a studio. 

Architecture?  The idea must arise from all the straight lines.  Light?  All the bright colors, yellow and white, why, they must be representative of—light.  Ocean?  I don’t know.  You tell me.  And park?  You mean park like grass and trees and, oh, aren’t those the legs of giant picnic tables?


Charles Tarlton, "The Turn of Art"

This piece was originally published in Fiction International, Issue 45, "About Seeing." It is dedicated to Janet Bishop, Thomas Weisel Family Curator of Painting and Sculpture, SFMOMA, whose tour around "The Steins Collect" was so exhilarating.




The Turn of Art
A dramatic scene in prose and verse

Gertrude Stein and Alice B. Toklas’s atelier at 27 rue de Fleurus, Paris.  It is 1907.
The room is filled with heavy furniture, a large writing desk, sideboards, tables, and cupboards.
1. Pablo Picasso (Left Stage Center) and Henri Matisse (right Stage Center) sit in low chairs across from each other in front of the fireplace (Up Stage Center). They face us as if looking into a camera (think of the famous photo of Gertrude Stein and Alice B. Toklas by Man Ray taken in 1922).
On the wall (Up Stage Left) behind PICASSO, 5 MATISSE paintings are hanging—Woman in a hat (1905), Madame Matisse (1905), Le Bonheur de vivre (1905-6), Blue Nude (1907), and Self-portrait (1906).

On the wall (Up Stage Right) behind MATISSE we see 5 PICASSO paintings—Boy Leading a Horse (1905-6)), Gertrude Stein (1905-6), Young Acrobat on a Ball (1905), Nude with Joined Hands (1906), and Self-portrait (1906).
PICASSO
once we had turned
our backs on the museums
            Pause.
where could we go?
            Indicates MATISSE, sarcastically.
then he started drawing
lines of paint an inch wide
MATISSE
wasn’t easy
while so many others
were portraying
the fine line of a nose
details in strands of hair
PICASSO
not enough, not
for him.  Just to make it
look like real fruit
            Pause.
no more trompe-l'œil for him
            Pause.
dot’s enough for a nipple
MATISSE
I drew with brush
loads of flat blue house paint
made my lines thick
all around the outside
black between trees and sky
Pause.

MATISSE stands and crosses the room.  He takes Boy Leading a Horse from the wall and carries it back to his chair.  He leans it against the wall beside his chair and sits down.
Not every one, however, followed my lead.
Pause, admiring Picasso’s picture.
browns and some grays
this is a precocious child’s
drawing.  A horse!
a boy’s dream of the West
the open plains to ride
PICASSO
a poetic
dream might more easily
bring in the cash
hung on their wall till 1913
you often saw it there
Pause, PICASSO points to a spot on the wall
later Nazis forced
von Mendelssohn-Bartholdy
to liquidate
hispano-judaic
art smuggled out and sold
MATISSE
marketable
like pigeons in St Marks
swarmed around you
as they changed to property
they escaped like wild birds
Pause.
I was waiting
for you to drop it all
come up to art
renounce celebrity
stop showing off—show us!
works of genius
make us feel supremely
diminutive
genius has to give it up
forfeit its advantage
PICASSO
has to give up what?
MATISSE
superiority
Pause.
they used to say
I wish I could draw like that
now they say, anyone could
            Pause.
PICASSO
I felt deeply
every brush stroke of these
as I made them
but in cold aftermath
just financial success
            Pause, as if reflecting.
I was watching, you know, despite my cool demeanor.  But, I loved the life in the cafés, you know, the money, spreading my name around.  And the women, they all wanted to touch my genius. 
            Pause.
You did none of that.  You ran no races, gave no quarter.
How was that?
you were ahead
tossing off thick-limbed monsters
driving me mad
you made these obstacles
I had to climb over
MATISSE
Finally!
PICASSO
I wanted to paint
with a heavier hand
lose all my fear
of teachers, my father
forget about the saints
MATISSE
could see clearly
down into the world’s heart
below surfaces
but you kept painting them,
the surfaces, the smiles
PICASSO stands and claps.  He then crosses the room behind MATISSE and removes Woman with a hat and carries it back to his chair and holds it on his lap, partly turning it so the audience can see.
PICASSO
this is, of course
all odd lumps of color
unexpected
rub out the woman’s face
PICASSO covers the face with his hand.
—and behold Kandinsky!
you sped ahead
on wings of distortion
shape and color
yours to waste, invent
new wonders for the eye
Pause.
no milliner
could make a hat like that
it was conceived
on an insane palette
laughing, you were laughing
MATISSE looks around the room, as if trying to orient himself. Coughs.
MATISSE
Somewhere near here, art’s roadmap changed abruptly.  Up ahead or looking just behind us, out of the corner of my eye, we were poking forward, looking for the line just so we could step over it. 
I saw you coming up.
PICASSO
the other side,
how I longed to be free
overstepping
there’d be no looking back
MATISSE
make the first real pictures!
2. The stage goes dark. Two middle-aged men emerge from the wings (Down Stage Right) under a single spot, dressed as GERTRUDE STEIN (PETER CARMODY) and ALICE B. TOKLAS (ANDREW BLIGHT) and wearing the same hats worn in the famous snapshot taken in Aix-les-Bains, 1927.
CARMODY (GERTRUDE)
they never knew
what the very next thing 
might be—tiny
legs, an arm, thick as trees
palm tree fronds like fish bones
BLIGHT (ALICE)
They were always searching for it, for the new.  At first in different ways; Picasso, of course, classically trained, gifted, was a long time shaking off the lessons, his tutored instincts.  The Blue and Rose periods—he could have been using a camera. 
            Pause.
Henri was different, all for crude outlines, sudden colors, rough dabs of paint, the merest suggestion.
CARMODY
he made it strange
defied the viewer’s eye
BLIGHT
no matter what
it was, it disappeared
CARMODY
into paint, just the paint
Pause.
That’s it, of course.  He overthrew the subject.
Only the paint counted.
That was where the eye fell; there, on the paint, the thick paint piling up, the paint on top of other paint, the paint plowed by the brush like a field readied for planting. 
Pause.
Look on the wall!  You see the picture of his wife, Madame Matisse, with the green line down her nose?  See what I mean? 
Compare that to Picasso; choose one there on the wall.
What about the portrait of Gertrude Stein?
            Pause.
I mean, my portrait.
PICASSO and MATISSE rise and retrieve their respective paintings and bring them (Down Stage Right).  They stand under the spot, holding the paintings in front of their chests.
BLIGHT
He meant it to look like you, a resemblance, but, he said, if it didn’t look like you right now, that was all right, because it eventually would.
CARMODY
it was just exactly me.
PICASSO holds the painting out and turns it so he can see it.  He looks at CARMODY.
PICASSO
I was looking for truth
not just surfaces
behind those eyes, a mind
was watching for a sign
CARMODY
You’re right, I had seen so much
Pauses, musing.
on the lookout
PICASSO
your eyes reach out to probe
what you’re hearing
as if to say, I had hoped
you’d not be like the rest
MATISSE
And, what do we say about Madame Matisse’s portrait? 
Can your discerning eye probe deeper meaning there? 
What do you make of that green stripe?
BLIGHT
perhaps you meant
only to encompass
her, register
your discontent with life
the burden of marriage
I always felt
MATISSE
pushed into the background
disapproval
in those black eyes, stern lips
BLIGHT
how would you even know?
CARMODY
I still say it’s the paint; the spirits of all the wild emotions caught up in spread paint, bone splinters in the ambergris—color, thickness, smell—wide brushes. 
It looks like whatever you want it to look like. 
Pause.
No. It was not about looking, or smelling, or being like anything at all. 
It meant in fact—red, the green, the violet, and orange; just as it means blue, black, and yellow—in any of their many permutations, in a chance encounter, as crude parts of the world.
MATISSE
it was to paint
because I was making
PICASSO
objects from paint
Pause.
my mind’s eye gave the world
only the quickest glance
3. CARMODY AND BLIGHT exit. Spot off, Stage lights up. MATISSE and PICASSO are back in their chairs.  PICASSO points up at a painting, The Young Acrobat on a Ball.
MATISSE
there’s a story
in that one for certain
pure narrative
tempts us to wondering
who the large sad man is
Pause.
I contemplate
more the lonely woman
child, boy, and dog
dreamily facing hills
where a white horse grazes
the acrobat
is a boy or a girl
learning to stand
on such uncertainty
focussing attention
PICASSO
it was Giotto
or me, could draw perfect
freehand circles
MATISSE
painted like Velázquez
aims now to be a child
MATISSE crosses the room and stands under his painting, Le Bonheur de Vivre. He points up to it.
PICASSO
Childishness, to be sure, yet there’s nothing childish about it. 
Your hills and distances are but suggested (did you notice?) while the big ideas, all the rest, are wild reds and greens, hints of mythology in all the playful poses, but circles and careless dots for eyes, spring frolics, and a touch of sensuousness, perspective out of whack
—verges on humorous.
far more expressive
than my pouting giant
or my morose
pale hills.  Your lovers run in
search of cartoon nudity
MATISSE
So, you want to talk about nudes?
MATISSE reaches up and removes Nude with Joined Hands.  He looks closely at it.
You were still painting like Velázquez.
            Pause.
you’re so polite
your nude’s too well-mannered
covers herself
could be from Pompey’s walls
a goddess or priestess
she’s a mural
painted on Spanish stucco
inside a church
PICASSO
I meant to paint
women someone could love
I was out to show the world who was master.  Infinite reflection and dark resignation show on the faces of my men; the deepest sadness, calm, or joy appears on the faces of my women, because they are so beautiful. The children know so much. 
I could not paint the kind of pulsing stones, the female boulders you were so happy to make.
Pause.
I dreamt women
you could take out walking
they’d hold your arm
it took time seeing how
wrong; longer catching up.
4. PICASSO goes behind his chair and takes out a long pointer rod.  He goes over to the paintings and stands in front of Blue Nude.  He points to it.
            Long Pause. He is just looking at the painting, transfixed for a moment.
this was vulgar
so I at first decided
androgynous
whore-sailor all in one
promiscuously drawn
PICASSO comes to (Down Stage Center), Pauses again, and leans intimately toward the audience, in confidence.
Pornographic.
            Pause, sighs in resignation.
this beautiful hulk is
REALITY
Look at it!  Look at it!
a carcass of hip bones
ankles, twisted rib cage
Pause, to MATISSE directly, as if, for the moment, giving in.
This was your high water mark. 
I knew it instantly.  I ran home and drew a hundred chunky naked women leaning on their elbows, sharp hip bones and one leg flung over the other—a hundred, at least. 
You had launched a thunderbolt, for certain, but I thought to myself, “I will rise to that, rise up to that!”
MATISSE
caught by surprise
lost sight of the way ahead
in a fever to catch up
            Pause.
with this the history
of modern art resumes 
PICASSO
that we could teach
the art world to embrace
this meaty toad
MATISSE
love and art together
move closer to the truth
PICASSO
The way ahead congealed, the compass and the raw materials were set. 
MATISSE
If anyone could have seen into the future, this would have been…
MATISSE makes an all-inclusive gesture with his waving arm.
…where it all started.
5. PICASSO reaches up and takes down the Self-portrait by MATISSE; MATISSE takes down the Self-portrait by PICASSO.  They both come (Down Stage Center) and stand holding the paintings and facing the audience. PICASSO pulls a false beard from the portrait of MATISSE. The two portraits reveal a strong family resemblance—the portraits of two brothers.
Curtain


Saturday, May 28, 2016

Charles Tarlton: "A Rock in a Jar"


      
While I work on my next artistic post, I am posting another poem by my husband, this one otherwise unpublished. I think it relates to Wallace Stevens's "Anecdote of the Jar, which is, in turn, related to Keats's "Ode on a Grecian Urn."  Stevens, Helen Vendler wrote, was answering "a vow to stop imitating Keats and seek a native American language that will not take the wild out of the wilderness" (quoted by Antonio José Jiménez Muñoz, University of Oviedo, http://www.academia.edu/7357036/Wallace_Stevens_Anecdote_of_the_Jar).  Charles Tarlton, whose narrator has, for the moment, "taken the wild out of the wilderness," says that his own poem came about because he dreamed of a rock that was bigger on the inside than it was on the outside. And says, now, that the poem may be about how difficult it is, and how scary it is, to change your whole view of the world.



 A Rock in a Jar

            1
your eye catches it
(unexpectedly, a straggly fugitive
detail amidst the forest’s
disarray, illogical and off-hand)
in a glimpse of sun down through
a brushy filter of pine.
just a small irregular rock,
glassy blue, and subtly blurred
below the currents of a mountain
creek, somewhere off the road.
not at all auspicious, this rock,
water pocked and angular,
the underside a flat polished
mica sliver of sky, grey
on the upwards. A rock gone
unnoticed other than obliquely
by the odd skittish deer come
for a drink, or raucous blue
jays stirring up a bath.
now, visualize this rock
in the palm of your hand, destined
for the jar of souvenir seashells; 
see reflected in it now
your own curious glances,
the backdrop of sky and cloud
you’re standing in.  It goes
in your pocket, clicking up
against a penny and a quarter.
once home, emptying your treasure
on the kitchen table, you laugh,
remembering the little rock,
and drop it in the jar
of seashells. It alters everything;
its mirror refracts the crowded
seashore contents of the jar. The shells
roll over and roll their eyes.
           
2 
“every vacation from now on,”
you’d said, on that last day at the beach
“we’ll come back here and add more
seashells to the jar. A sort of observance. 
notice the clumsy, lopsided
collisions of the rock against
the smooth parabolas and ampersands,
the swirled edges, and thin ridges
of the lustrous shells. Turn the jar
in your hands, and the tumbling
upstart rock reveals the graceful
seashells to themselves.  Mother
of pearl discovering its reflection
in the watery isinglass;
the rock wears their likenesses
disguising the dissonance.


            3
the red and yellow kitchen walls
awake and crowd the scene;
a roomful of common objects
strategically pinpointed like 
the sectors of an artillery map,
imagined ribbons stretched,
and fastened to thumbtacks,
the battle of ontological
vectors. New truths revolve
in the room, the jar and the rock
and shells arc along the compass,
projecting, as from a disco ball,
the center out to the periphery.
the increase of distance
and of angular rotation throw
rock and shells lewdly
each against the other.  They exchange
expectant kisses in the jar,
the jar caresses them.  This dumb
subversive rock has brought
the windows in, and with the windows,
trees as well as sky.  No glass
confines its movements, the rock
sees at the speed of light.
with the seashells in the jar,
the jar centers the kitchen,
surrounded by yellows and reds,
the colors spreading inward and out;
the rock greedy, the rock coquettish,
looking past the kitchen
and its own projected kitchens
into the trees and clouds. 
what does its cold eye remember? 

            4
not ever being born, the rock
knows nothing about ripening,
or the fluctuations of growth emerging
ahead of the blood’s vulgar spurts,
but only sameness, always the one
thing. The water lay over it,
beyond the water, light and dark,
blue sky in its stillness,
clouds slow, white or gray,
and glaring sun. The rock had no
organic roots, no family; it was a chip
randomly broken from some larger rock.
memory was of no consequence to it,
nothing grew or passed through it.
geometry and physics were its genesis,
whose Forms are over and over
seeded, crystallized, and dumbly cleft
(no massif could ever conceive, gestate,
or bear pebbles in its image.  No boulder
promiscuously unrolls
green tendrils to bind itself
to the fence.  Now, the rock finds
itself transmuted; it can smell the ocean
on the shells, the hints of flesh
in the wet jar, a salt-sea stink
unknown amongst the magma and things
that have simply boiled and cooled
from which he came.  A real novelty,
this rock, burly adjacent
to the daintier seashells
exhibiting traces how they once
were hinged to allow life to pump
in and out, wherein they could hide
from the light itself, or wear rings
marking how they grew, were used,
and had aged.  The rock cannot grow,
but only be worn down, roughly gouged
across its glassy eye, or broken.
past the shells and the kitchen 
implements, the rock records the sky, 
exploring how to seize the garden,
and bring it all in, to catalogue
the exuberant and unfamiliar
flowers, combing the saw-tooth
of picket fence for new theorems. 
Gathering as it goes along,
it wants to teach the shells more
than the walls, to reveal the widening
circumstances a propos themselves,
to show them to the moon.

5
nothing waits behind these
reflections but impenetrable
crystal; how a little rock contains
the world.  Everything adds up
—shells, walls, windows, trees,
fence, clouds, and the sky,
and as far as the eye can see
into the little retina in the jar. 
but the rock still knows nothing.
no time passes there, though movement
and stillness come and go and rest.
inertia, wound up or disengaged
like a broken watch spring,
metes out random, uncalibrated
distances and speeds.  Time
should be able to record
something meaningful.  All the things
inside and out are sizing
one another up according to weight
and their proximity;
they go fast or slow, eagerly
waiting (or tense with dread)
for something to come around
again, make any of it matter.
we will keep vigil out
our windows, throw one another
censorious looks, tragic
to comic, in the to and fro.
scenes projected on the rock’s
cinematic surface need more
than what the reflecting
unreflective little rock has
so far been able to deliver us. 

            6
a lonely pine tree
on a hilltop miles away
resists the gathering leer
of the rock (circling birds, warm
air rising, housetop TV aerials,
and wood smoke in streaks above
the rows of chimneys partly obscure
the tree’s conical shape;
its millions of needles cannot
be seen at all; they will not
project on the rock’s tiny screen).
in true synthesis, large
is found in small, complexity
hides simple, and distances
obscure reduction.  Up to now,
fine coincidence of angle
and light defined the standpoint
of the rock; the seashells were
perfect, too, companions
in illusion, motionless, solid,
yet happy to pass through the glass.

but, we have not been scrupulous
enough about cupboards
or picket fences.  We ignored
the obvious limitations of the rock’s
field of view in the excitement
of shattering boundaries.
everyone’s eye had overreached; 
with these troubling observations
we have a turning point.
the story’s true; the last rays
from reclining Helios (not even
a rock can look straight
into the sun) cool obliquely
off the white paint of the fence,
cool flames in the window’s
bold returning stare. The shells grew
anxious. The walls come in close.
Everything is just an idea,
thought all round. The rock failed
to hold the fractious light
in lifelike image, the beholder’s
visual cortex reduced to changing
photons into bare neural impulse,
making inferences from what
others had said they’d seen. 
distant objects are, perhaps, best
drawn, then, in the mind’s eye.
to enter into the cave of the mind,
the world must become a dream.
rock walls intrude uncouthly,
but interpretations and design
are dreamed. No properly
animated rock would continue
to prefer geometry to process,
or give preference to sine
and cosine once he’d known
the asymmetric shrubs and crooked
cupboard doors, or the fine
irregular squiggles rough soles
have randomly scratched on
the checkerboard linoleum.
the rock is moving on just so,
abandoning straight lines
and perfect parallelograms, isosceles
triangles, regular zigzags,
and logarithmic curlicues. 
Let the the rock be sentient!”
the audience chants.  We need a thinker
to imagine needles, who will
let us see their impossibly
excruciating distant thinness.”

            7
pondered deeply, our thinking
reveals it lineage in flesh, 
how it was always birthed
behind closed skulls.  Along
the atom-to-atom circuitry, chemical
reactions pile up, a cluster
here, a sinewy string of connections.
absence and presence, stuff
cluttering the doorway, well-lit
garden gates and pitch darkness. 
such a lot is going on.
shadow and light play
in tangles over the retina;
synthesis-choosing metabolic
pathways down the cell-morass
of nerve and cerebral fluids. 
isomerized draperies of purple
and violet, waving rods
and cones, linked beyond wet
surfaces, bravely running
neuron rapids to the cortex.
it is all the same with seeing.
clusters of electric charge
positioned like infielders
on the trusting retina, where
the brain extrudes part of its inward
workings to the outward
like a hernia; just so that
inside and out connect
on the mica layers of our rock’s
eye, on its flat reflecting
side.  It picks up light waves
and reworks them. If a hair
is missing from a well-known
ear, the conceptual apparatus fills
it in; the same with pine needles.
the general idea spiffs up
the fragmentary thing. Experience
makes metaphors from our
stimulated nerves and the secretions
washing in waves over brain
cells. Changes of temperature
and the rhythms of discharge
turn into hatred, logical relations,
a bad chill. The scientist probes
the one, devising machines to manifest
the unseen goings on, the poet
dresses up in the tattered others,
rummaging for lacey brooches and
sepia albums with dried flowers and
obituaries cut from old newspapers.

            8
the rock as poet, poetizing
rock (to complete the metaphor) 
simulates without within
in both the crystals of its micaceous
window and deeply in the hard
granite below.  It can conjure
what collides, rework whatever
dances on its screen.
it can make corrections
in obedience to theory where
observations might just not
confirm specifics.  All this was
expected from the start,
the careful reader will allow. 
we were always looking through
the rock’s eyes. Now the pine needles
are displayed fo r all to see. 
the jar reaches round to caress
the seashells, the seashells
rub up against the glass,
each other and their reborn
hero rock.  The rock makes and shows
movies on its little screen;
the camera dollies and tracks
in an ever widening gyre.
until now no one had noticed
a defect in the mica, on the lower
left-hand corner of the little
squarish mirror, just a tiny chip
that marks a blind spot,
a hole in the rock’s retina. 
it shows up as a blur on the edge
of the closest huddling mollusk,
causes a bend in the third fence
picket from the left, but goes
unnoticed up in the clouds,
where details roll, spread,
and swirl anyway.  Anyway,
it’s just a quirk that makes
the rock’s world entirely
the rock’s own; the rock’s theories
are rock theories.  Undeterred,
the rock detours around its chip. 

            9
now, we have humane intelligence
performed by a reproducing rock
picked up from a brook where
it had tumbled, probably,
for several lifetimes.  It can
see anything as far as
there’s good reason to see,
though an imperfection
nicked into its glassy edge
drives the eye to replicate
the error in each successive
scaling; progress and increase
are thus bought with ever
magnified distortion.
the goal was, absolutely
from the start, to see the swirls
etched in the pearly core
curvature of seashells in the jar
and then reflected in the shape
of the assembled stars (maybe
to discern the milky-way, and
with it, God’s own plan,
in the nacre inlay mirrored
in half a clam).  What the rock
lusted after was much more
than merely sight and sense;
it now sought a knowledge,
some certitude how everything
was governed, how each and every
part imbued the whole.
in the passing of Time,
the immense distances reaching
always toward us, fold over
themselves along a fault line,
a cosmic curtain wafting
in celestial breezes.  Undulations
fan out from the center
to the edge, from large and near
to small and far, and the reverse,
exhibiting the infinite
in all its insignificance.
to the rock, what’s happened
might all have been predicted;
the shape of the world resembling
familiar whorls inside familiar
seashells. All worlds grow, the gods
from rows of planted teeth;
everything unfolds until it
runs up against our stone
idiosyncrasies—our philosophies
will then certainly mount up.

            10
The Philosophy of the Rock, I

this rock considered farthest worlds
subject to its mirror, they could be
dragged into the jar, put under glass. 
remote was just another instance
of close by.  If it fits into
the mirror, how strange could
it be, how hard to understand it?
the shells themselves had never
moved of their own accord; sometimes
the jar was jostled or revolved,
and shells appeared at odd angles. 
the rock’s sweeping gaze edited
the jockeying calcite matrices
composing tableaux framed to
show only their very best sides,
oil on water spreading rainbows
of soft violet, blue, and pink.
when the sun stood just above
the picket fence, and the rain
had gone, the rock could paint seashell
patterns in the sky, could imagine
clouds as trompe l’oeil bowls
of fruit, could fashion mythic war
chariots, the mirages
of their steam-snorting horses
quivering in a rising patch of pale blue sky.

in the rock’s mind the world
gave up its secrets in the mirror,
what the mirror could imagine.
from familiar to odd and weird is farther
than the distance traveled back,
when we hold our discoveries in old
cloth sacks sewn from common
knowledge.  Nothing was entirely new.
blue light off the pretty shells
bent oddly as we know (don’t forget
the imperfection on the mirror’s face,
that unseeing smidgen), so the farther
away it surveyed, the farther the rock’s
estimates were off.  The larger errors
presently began to haunt the intimates
within the jar.  No shell was long
allowed to mean just what it meant.
shells became embodiments of vaster
implications; they wrongly stood
for more.  The rock could not turn
to face away from any blemished shell, 
could not ignore an imperfection
(it was powerless in that regard;
it could not move nor could it see
just how it wrongly saw), so it read
less meaning in the places its own
reflection spread.  Those sad stars
received the names of lesser deities
     —panic, narcissism, cupidity. 
in the rock’s garden, they were simply
moved into the shade, where
they vied with dying lilies.

             11
The Philosophy of the Rock, II
there are two senses, the rock
avers, of center; the jar
that holds the rock and the rock itself. 
the rock contains the world,
and the jar holds the rock,
but cannot hold the rock’s roving
eye. Knowing no limits, the rock
imagines also God in two persons,
one that does, and another
that makes possible. The rock
is the moving center,
going where it sees things
on the cracked, distorted glass,
inventing fabulous objects
and creatures, three-winged
blackbirds pecking insects
on a twisting fence, or rooftops
droopy in the center, bowed with
imaginary weight.  The jar is
the center that holds still.
what moves, is then moving
around it.  See it and you are
justified and can understand
how to drag objects under the lens
and read out the name of each --
fence, flower, shell, cloud, star,”
edicts from proclaimed divinity,
vain and arrogant, insisting
Time and Motion owe their Being
to its Will (the rock in the jar).
no other Genesis is countenanced.
word gets around—the Cat is out.

the fence was created for shade
infrequently dappled in dark
and lighter stripes along the flowers;
the flowers were born from the need
for a capricious yellow
offered up to the rock; the clouds
and the stars among them sing
a music silent in the yard,
heard only by the rock itself
within the jar; the cracks are plastered
up with mysteries.  listen. . . .“
the rock begins to hum,
some excess energy blows as wind
through a whistle-notched reed,
hardly audible at first, but soon
a rattling is noticed among
the seashells, sending brittle echoes
along the curved glass of the jar.
the table sways in sympathy
and the whistling, ever shriller,
passes through the windows to the yard,
past the fence, into the waiting sky. 
as if the world had been tapped
like a tuning fork, the pitch
infects glass, rock, wood, plant,
and stars.  They squirm in oscillating
rhythms—No one can sleep.

            12
the action in the jar intrudes
impossibly into your own restless
tossing in the noisy, jar-shaking
night.  Culpability awakes and wakes
you and in you, makes you stare
into the blackness.  The night
hangs slack in the windows,
but the rock glows in your mind’s
eye, threatening reason
and routine with its anarchy.

I’ve got to put it back,”
you whisper, coming up from sleep.
Something’s very wrong.”
Put what back?” your wife wants to know.
The rock,” you whisper, “the rock I stole
from its place in the stream bed.”
“Oh, that’s silly; go back to sleep.

instead, you get up quietly
and dress.  In the kitchen everything
is still.  Some invisible token
of calamity remains, but you can’t
be sure.  The whole room,
the windows, and the yard outside
are holding their breath.
you pick up the jar, walk to the sink,
twist the lid, and smelly water
pours through your fingers
along with seashells, till you have
only the rock inert, so small
in your hand; it goes into
your pocket and weighs a ton
by the time you’ve hiked
and found the pool.  The exact
desecrated site discovered,
an obvious hollow the size
of the errant rock in the sandy
bottom of the stream.  Surrounding
rocks gape blindly, oblivious
to dull shapes and shadows,
waiting in perpetual obscurity,
dead to the spreading dawn. 
you go down on one knee to refit
the stone, face up, like a glass eye
in its socket. It barely glances,
but you catch the wet suggestion
of yourself as the rock sees you. 
the fracture on the layered mica
surface twists your cameo,
making your right eye enlarge fiercely;
then it’s gone.  The tumbling
stream rolls the rock over
on its face, its unseeing granite
backside facing upwards now.