Showing posts with label "old bones" vs. "contemporary skin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label "old bones" vs. "contemporary skin. Show all posts

Sunday, October 30, 2011

"The bones of the old ..."

I  rip up -- or paint over -- a huge percentage of what I paint. I destroy anything in a series that doesn't shape up to the strongest piece. As I have worked on this Odalisque Series, I keep looking in my storage room to see if there are any "incomplete" older works that I can play with now and use for the foundational canvases. There was a painting from this summer, a very pretty thing, a triptych, that was very fine in its way but ... it was a Joan Mitchell. So I have taken it and re-worked it into this new world of mine.

I was reading Louis Menand in The New Yorker a few weeks ago; he had reviewed an edition of Eliot's letters (the article: "Practical Cat: How Eliot Became Eliot," September 19, 2011).  He said that "to modernize is not to make a brand-new thing; it's to bring an old thing up to date .... ["The Wasteland," for example, was] something primitive .... recast in a contemporary idiom .... the bones of the old are legible (or visible or audible) under the contemporary skin. That's what produces modernist dissonance" (p. 80).  So maybe I am immersing myself in modernist dissonance (or, as one of the characters said, in the end of Breaker Morant, "then I'm a Pagan, too"). Here are the "old bones," my unintentional Mitchell:

 And here is the "contemporary skin," at least so far:


Eliot wrote (in a preface to a book of Harry Crosby's poems in 1931): "Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go." Well, here we go.